Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "__integrated_assemler__".
Did you mean:
__integrated_assembler__
2014 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Adding __INTEGRATED_ASSEMLER__ macro
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool
<compnerd at compnerd.org>wrote:
>
>
>> But I agree with others that "integrated assembler" isn't a feature which
>> should be observable in source code.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote:
>>
>>> On a higher level,
2014 Feb 24
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Adding __INTEGRATED_ASSEMLER__ macro
This seems to be a slightly contentious suggestion, so it seems fitting to
bring it up on cfe-dev.
Given that -fintegrated-as and -fno-integrated-as are available to the
user, and that the integrated assembler can be a bit stringent (as compared
to GAS at least, which, for example, supports deprecated syntax), it might
be nice to permit the user to detect that an integrated assembler is in use.
2014 Feb 24
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Adding __INTEGRATED_ASSEMLER__ macro
First, I would assume this would be better spelled as:
__has_feature(integrated_assembler)
But I agree with others that "integrated assembler" isn't a feature which
should be observable in source code.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote:
> On a higher level, there's the quality issue. People should test for
>