search for: __if__

...9;s example to Bill's proposal has shown, so I had looked > at .Primitive() solutions of both. > > In hindsight I should have asked here for advice, but may at > the time I had been a bit frustrated by the results of some of > my RFCs ((nothing specific in mind !)) > > But __if__ there's really no example where current (3.5.0 and newer) > > ...length() > > differs from Hadley's dotlength() > I'd vert happy to replace ...length 's C based definition by > Hadley's beautiful minimal solution. > > Martin > > > > On...

Hi, It would be great if one of the experts could comment on the difference between Hadley's dotlength and ...length? The fact that someone bothered to implement a new primitive for that when there seems to be a very simple and straightforward R-only solution suggests that there might be some gotchas/pitfalls with the R-only solution. Thanks, H. On 05/03/2018 08:34 AM, Hadley Wickham

...ked >> at .Primitive() solutions of both. >> >> In hindsight I should have asked here for advice, but may at >> the time I had been a bit frustrated by the results of some of >> my RFCs ((nothing specific in mind !)) >> >> But __if__ there's really no example where current (3.5.0 and newer) >> >> ...length() >> >> differs from Hadley's dotlength() >> I'd vert happy to replace ...length 's C based definition by >> Hadley's beautiful minimal soluti...

...nd one at the time), as Duncan's example to Bill's proposal has shown, so I had looked at .Primitive() solutions of both. In hindsight I should have asked here for advice, but may at the time I had been a bit frustrated by the results of some of my RFCs ((nothing specific in mind !)) But __if__ there's really no example where current (3.5.0 and newer) ...length() differs from Hadley's dotlength() I'd vert happy to replace ...length 's C based definition by Hadley's beautiful minimal solution. Martin > On 05/03/2018 08:34 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote: &gt...