Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "__i686__".
Did you mean:
__i386__
2015 Jul 21
2
[LLVMdev] [3.7 Release] RC1 has been tagged, Testing Phase I begins
...x.cmake:125 (message):
Cannot compile for i686:
CMakeError.log attached
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is we "guess" that the host architecture is i686, and fail
> when we find out that we can't target it (__i686__ is not defined).
> This guess originates from get_host_triple() call
> in cmake/modules/GetHostTriple.cmake.
> Probably, it makes sense to fix that to return i568 on openSUSE, and then
> test for i586 in the same way we already test for i386/i686.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at...
2015 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] [3.7 Release] RC1 has been tagged, Testing Phase I begins
Seems on OpenSUSE x86, it's called i586, not i686 :-(
+Alexey: do you think we can handle this in the compiler-rt cmake
files somehow? Maybe try targeting both i686 and i586 unless that
would break something else?
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote:
> CMake Error at projects/compiler-rt/cmake/config-ix.cmake:125 (message):
> Cannot
2024 Oct 08
0
Question: Is CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT=1 needed for rsync on RISC-V
...he developers of
rsync seem to assume that only x86 CPUs can handle memory misalignments:
```c
/* We know that the x86 can handle misalignment and has the same
?* byte order (LSB-first) as the 32-bit numbers we transmit. */
#if defined __i386__ || defined __i486__ || defined __i586__ || defined
__i686__ || __amd64
#define CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT 0
#endif
#ifndef CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT
#define CAREFUL_ALIGNMENT 1
#endif
```
Thus, when copying 4-bit integers (just an example), rsync uses direct
copies on x86:
```c
static inline uint32
IVALu(const uchar *buf, int pos)
{
?? ?union {
?? ???? const uchar *b...
2018 Nov 16
2
OSX 10.5 PowerPC and hang after "Looking for __cxa_throw in stdc++"
...ad
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found
-- Looking for __cxa_throw in c++
-- Looking for __cxa_throw in c++ - not found
-- Looking for __cxa_throw in stdc++
-- Looking for __cxa_throw in stdc++ - found
The Cmake script does not appear to move on to other tests like "--
Looking for __i686__" (if
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-December/108363.html is
accurate).
Any ideas what might be going sideways?
Thanks in advance.
2016 Feb 25
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
...for shm_open in rt
-- Looking for shm_open in rt - found
-- Looking for pow in m
-- Looking for pow in m - found
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthread
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found
-- Looking for __cxa_throw in stdc++
-- Looking for __cxa_throw in stdc++ - found
-- Looking for __i686__
-- Looking for __i686__ - found
-- Looking for __i386__
-- Looking for __i386__ - found
-- Compiler-RT supported architectures: x86_64
-- Looking for rpc/xdr.h
-- Looking for rpc/xdr.h - found
-- Looking for tirpc/rpc/xdr.h
-- Looking for tirpc/rpc/xdr.h - not found
-- Performing Test COMPILER_RT_T...
2016 Mar 03
3
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
I had only a quick view on the blog-texts.
It might be that a CLANG generated with LTO/PGO speeds up the build.
Can you confirm this?
Can you confirm binutils-gold speed up the build?
Has LLVM an own linker?
Can be used? Speedup the build?
Yesterday night I loooked through available CMAKE/LLVM variables...
### GOLD
# CMAKE_LINKER:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/ld
#
2016 Dec 19
1
How to create Debian packages for release 3.9.0
Hello,
Le 12/12/2016 à 18:29, Hans Wennborg a écrit :
> +Sylvestre who knows about these things.
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Kris van Rens via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> L.S.,
>>
>> I'm currently in the process of creating Debian packages for
>> clang/llvm release 3.9.0. For this I'm using the steps as explained on
2016 Mar 17
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote:
[ brutal-snip ]
...
> [ TODO#S: Before doing a 2nd build (and in a 3rd run using more
> optimized binaries) ]
>
> How do I anable LTO via CMAKE?
>
>
> LLVM_ENALBLE_LTO=On
>
[ v4 of my build-script attached ]
Hi Chris,
thanks for the response!
That seems to work (see below).
$ cd
2017 Feb 11
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
Trying to run a self host "ninja check-clang" with ASan enabled I hit a
/lot/ of errors like this (strangely I hit none of these in check-llvm,
only in check-clang):
Any ideas?
==10525==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x10800 (67584) bytes
at address 0x631000014800
==10525==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
2017 Feb 15
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
...clude/python2.7][v2.7.6()]
//Details about finding SWIG
FIND_PACKAGE_MESSAGE_DETAILS_SWIG:INTERNAL=[/usr/bin/swig2.0][/usr/share/swig2.0][v2.0.11()]
//Details about finding Threads
FIND_PACKAGE_MESSAGE_DETAILS_Threads:INTERNAL=[TRUE][v()]
//Have symbol __i386__
HAS_i386_DEF:INTERNAL=1
//Have symbol __i686__
HAS_i686_DEF:INTERNAL=
//Have symbol backtrace
HAVE_BACKTRACE:INTERNAL=1
//Have include CrashReporterClient.h
HAVE_CRASHREPORTERCLIENT_H:INTERNAL=
//Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB
HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB:INTERNAL=1
//Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB
HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB:INTERNA...