Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "__high".
Did you mean:
b_high
2007 Dec 04
10
[PATCH 0/10] Integrate msr.h
Hello,
This series of patches integrates msr.h header.
What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us
to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions
With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy,
just a couple of extra code.
The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed
to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,
2007 Dec 04
10
[PATCH 0/10] Integrate msr.h
Hello,
This series of patches integrates msr.h header.
What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us
to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions
With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy,
just a couple of extra code.
The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed
to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,
2013 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Loop Vectorizer puzzle
...l_loop_access !0
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %5, i64 %indvars.iv
%6 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
store i32 %6, i32* %arrayidx, align 4, !llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access !0
%indvars.iv.next = add i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%7 = add i32 %__index.addr.07, 1
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %7, %__high
br i1 %exitcond, label %loop.end, label %loop.body, !llvm.loop.parallel !0
If I want to add metadata for the vector length how should it look? One thing that would be nice is not having to check branches for different types of loop metadata. How about changing llvm.loop.parallel to llvm.loop and...
2013 May 23
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM Loop Vectorizer puzzle
On May 23, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 23 May 2013 14:52, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote:
> I would like us to grow a few annotations, among others, one to force vectorization irrespective whether the loop vectorizer thinks it is beneficial or not - however, this is future music.
>
> Isn't that part