search for: __have_arch_pmdp_invalidate

...e helper's > functionality more accurately while changing the above mentioned situation > as follows. This does not create any functional change. > > [pmd_present(pmd_mknotvalid(pmd)) = true] > > This is not applicable for platforms that define own pmdp_invalidate() via > __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_INVALIDATE. Suggestion for renaming came during a previous > discussion here. Bikeshed alert: maybe pmd_mkinvalid() would be better, given that this is a one-trick pony for pmdp_invalidate()? Will

This series renames pmd_mknotpresent() as pmd_mknotvalid(). Before that it drops an existing pmd_mknotpresent() definition from powerpc platform which was never required as it defines it's pmdp_invalidate() through subscribing __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_INVALIDATE. This does not create any functional change. This rename was suggested by Catalin during a previous discussion while we were trying to change the THP helpers on arm64 platform for migration. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11019637/ This series is based on v5.6-rc6. Boot tested on arm64 and...

...ile changing the above mentioned situation > >> as follows. This does not create any functional change. > >> > >> [pmd_present(pmd_mknotvalid(pmd)) = true] > >> > >> This is not applicable for platforms that define own pmdp_invalidate() via > >> __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_INVALIDATE. Suggestion for renaming came during a previous > >> discussion here. > > > > Bikeshed alert: maybe pmd_mkinvalid() would be better, given that this is > > a one-trick pony for pmdp_invalidate()? > > I had thought about making it pmd_mkinvalid() earlier. But as we...

This series renames pmd_mknotpresent() as pmd_mkinvalid(). Before that it drops an existing pmd_mknotpresent() definition from powerpc platform which was never required as it defines it's pmdp_invalidate() through subscribing __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_INVALIDATE. This does not create any functional change. This rename was suggested by Catalin during a previous discussion while we were trying to change the THP helpers on arm64 platform for migration. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11019637/ This series is based on v5.7-rc2. Boot tested on arm64 and...

On 03/20/2020 10:24 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This series renames pmd_mknotpresent() as pmd_mknotvalid(). Before that it > drops an existing pmd_mknotpresent() definition from powerpc platform which > was never required as it defines it's pmdp_invalidate() through subscribing > __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_INVALIDATE. This does not create any functional change. > > This rename was suggested by Catalin during a previous discussion while we > were trying to change the THP helpers on arm64 platform for migration. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11019637/ > > This series is based on v...

...nctionality more accurately while changing the above mentioned situation >> as follows. This does not create any functional change. >> >> [pmd_present(pmd_mknotvalid(pmd)) = true] >> >> This is not applicable for platforms that define own pmdp_invalidate() via >> __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_INVALIDATE. Suggestion for renaming came during a previous >> discussion here. > > Bikeshed alert: maybe pmd_mkinvalid() would be better, given that this is > a one-trick pony for pmdp_invalidate()? I had thought about making it pmd_mkinvalid() earlier. But as we were replacing pmd_mknotprese...

...) as pmd_mknotvalid() reflecting the helper's functionality more accurately while changing the above mentioned situation as follows. This does not create any functional change. [pmd_present(pmd_mknotvalid(pmd)) = true] This is not applicable for platforms that define own pmdp_invalidate() via __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_INVALIDATE. Suggestion for renaming came during a previous discussion here. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11019637/ Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta at synopsys.com> Cc: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel...