search for: __gnu_cxx

...nkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*)", referenced from: PrototypeAST::Codegen() in ccHkdHVT.o "llvm::Instruction::Instruction(llvm::Type const*, unsigned int, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::Instruction*)", referenced from: llvm::CallInst::CallInst<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<llvm::Value**, std::vector<llvm::Value*, std::allocator<llvm::Value*> > > >(llvm::Value*, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<llvm::Value**, std::vector<llvm::Value*, std::allocator<llvm::Value*> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<llvm::Value**,...

...g conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. llvm-2.7 $ make ... llvm[1]: Compiling BasicBlock.cpp for Release build /usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.3.2/../../../../include/c++/4.3.2/bits/boost_concept_check.h: In member function ‘bool __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, _Second>::__constraints_() [with _First = llvm::BasicBlock, _Second = llvm::BasicBlock*]’: /usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.3.2/../../../../include/c++/4.3.2/bits/boost_concept_check.h:296: instantiated from ‘void __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, _Second>:...

...GW/bin/sh.exe"-2.04$ ./configure --prefix=/usr -- enable-optimized --disa ble-shared --disable-multilib --disable-asserts output: llvm[1]: Compiling BasicBlock.cpp for Release build c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ boost_concept_check.h: In member function 'bool __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, _Second>::__constraint s_() [with _First = llvm::BasicBlock, _Second = llvm::BasicBlock*]': c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ boost_concept_check.h:296 : instantiated from 'void __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, _Second>::__...

...sserts >> Ok...I would have expected that to suppress the following error: >> output: >> llvm[1]: Compiling BasicBlock.cpp for Release build >> c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ >> boost_concept_check.h: In >> member function 'bool __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, >> _Second>::__constraint >> s_() [with _First = llvm::BasicBlock, _Second = llvm::BasicBlock*]': >> c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ >> boost_concept_check.h:296 >> : instantiated from 'void __gnu_cxx:...

...--prefix=/usr -- > enable-optimized --disa > ble-shared --disable-multilib --disable-asserts > > output: > llvm[1]: Compiling BasicBlock.cpp for Release build > c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ > boost_concept_check.h: In > member function 'bool __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, > _Second>::__constraint > s_() [with _First = llvm::BasicBlock, _Second = llvm::BasicBlock*]': > c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ > boost_concept_check.h:296 > : instantiated from 'void __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<...

...t&, llvm::Module*)", > referenced from: > PrototypeAST::Codegen() in ccHkdHVT.o > "llvm::Instruction::Instruction(llvm::Type const*, unsigned int, > llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::Instruction*)", referenced from: > llvm::CallInst::CallInst<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<llvm::Value**, > std::vector<llvm::Value*, std::allocator<llvm::Value*> > > >> (llvm::Value*, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<llvm::Value**, > std::vector<llvm::Value*, std::allocator<llvm::Value*> > >, > __gnu_cxx::__normal_ite...

...ince it compiles fine on Leopard. When assertions are disabled I get this error: llvm[1]: Compiling IntrinsicInst.cpp for Release-Asserts build In file included from IntrinsicInst.cpp:32: c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ boost_concept_check.h: In instantiation of '__gnu_cxx::_SGIAssignableConcept<llvm::MachineMove>': c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/stl_vector.h: 179: insta ntiated from 'std::vector<llvm::MachineMove, std::allocator<llvm::MachineMove> > ' c:/Users/Greybird/Desktop/llvm/llvm-2.4/include/llvm/Code...

Is it possible to merge StructTypes with different names like: %"class.std::allocator.4" = type { i8 } %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.5" = type { i8 } %"class.std::allocator.0" = type { i8 } %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.1" = type { i8 } %"class.std::allocator.0.6" = type { i8 } merge into %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator" = type { i8 } %"class.std::allocator&...

...not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdio:172: error: ::vscanf has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdio:174: error: ::vsscanf has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdio:180: error: __gnu_cxx::snprintf has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdio:181: error: __gnu_cxx::vfscanf has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/g++-v4/cstdio:182: error: __gnu_cxx::vscanf has not been declared /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/i...

.../tmp/ccb5CDSP.s gccld -o hello -L/home/yue/cfrontend/install/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4-llvm -L/home/yue/cfrontend/install/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4-llvm/../../.. /tmp/ccppFGsT.o -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lcrtend WARNING: Found global types that are not compatible: [16 x sbyte]* %_ZN9__gnu_cxx10messages_cE "struct.std::messages<char>"* %_ZN9__gnu_cxx10messages_cE WARNING: Found global types that are not compatible: [16 x sbyte]* %_ZN9__gnu_cxx10messages_wE "struct.std::messages<char>"* %_ZN9__gnu_cxx10messages_wE WARNING: Foun...

Hi Михаил, > Is it possible to merge StructTypes with different names like: > > %"class.std::allocator.4" = type { i8 } > %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.5" = type { i8 } > %"class.std::allocator.0" = type { i8 } > %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator.1" = type { i8 } > %"class.std::allocator.0.6" = type { i8 } > > merge into > > %"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator" = type { i...

...ble-optimized --disa >> ble-shared --disable-multilib --disable-asserts >> >> output: >> llvm[1]: Compiling BasicBlock.cpp for Release build >> c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ >> boost_concept_check.h: In >> member function 'bool __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, >> _Second>::__constraint >> s_() [with _First = llvm::BasicBlock, _Second = llvm::BasicBlock*]': >> c:\mingw\bin\../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/ >> boost_concept_check.h:296 >> : instantiated from 'void __gnu_cxx::_E...

...exe or dll file). Razvan PS: I also tried to compile llvm 2.3 in MSYS using the latest MinGW with gcc 4.3.0. This wasn't able to compile llvm at all because some errors like: d:\msys\bin\../lib/gcc/i386-pc-mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/boost_concept_check.h: In member function 'bool __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, _Second>::__constraints_() [with _First = llvm::BasicBlock, _Second = llvm::BasicBlock*]': d:\msys\bin\../lib/gcc/i386-pc-mingw32/4.3.0/include/c++/bits/boost_concept_check.h:296: instantiated from 'void __gnu_cxx::_EqualOpConcept<_First, _Second>::_...

...gives an assertion failure. This is the error message I get. Processing internal callee function rt_error opt: /localhome/ssahoo2/llvm/src/lib/Analysis/DataStructure/DataStructure.cpp:2248: static void llvm::DSGraph::computeNodeMapping(const llvm::DSNodeHandle&, const llvm::DSNodeHandle&, __gnu_cxx::hash_map<const llvm::DSNode*, llvm::DSNodeHandle, __gnu_cxx::hash<const llvm::DSNode*>, std::equal_to<const llvm::DSNode*>, std::allocator<llvm::DSNodeHandle> >&, bool): Assertion `Entry.getNode() == N2 && "Inconsistent mapping detected!"' failed....

...cost of keeping code around is usually not that large if you decide not to maintain it anymore. But that's called code rot, and it's generally not a good idea to accumulate too much of it. hash_map probably has bugs that we haven't and won't fix, etc. Libc++ implements a Standard. __gnu_cxx::hash_map is not part of (any version of) that Standard, and so it does not belong in libc++. When I remove or rename some internal function inside libc++ that uses reserved identifiers, I don't bother asking on this list. It doesn't mean that I purposefully try to break users (quite the op...

I need to generate variables like status1, status2, status3, ...... request1, request2, request3, ...... this is my code, other unrelated detail are eliminated. static int varNum; static const char *getVarNum() { ++varNum; std::stringstream ss; ss << varNum; std::string *varname = new std::string(ss.str()); return varname->c_str(); } const char *VarNum = getVarNum(); Twine *x1 = new

...a configure test for this as the related FIXME suggests. > llvm[3]: Compiling Deserialize.cpp for Release build > BitWriter.cpp: In function `int > LLVMWriteBitcodeToFileHandle(LLVMOpaqueModule*, > int)': > BitWriter.cpp:40: error: no matching function for call to ` > __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::stdio_filebuf(int&, > std::_Ios_Openmode)' > /usr/include/g++/ext/stdio_filebuf.h:53: error: candidates are: > __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::stdio_filebuf(const >...

...BitWriter.cpp:10: /home/edd/llvm/llvm-2.3/include/llvm/ParameterAttributes.h:71: warning: `inline ' is not at beginning of declaration BitWriter.cpp: In function `int LLVMWriteBitcodeToFileHandle(LLVMOpaqueModule*, int)': BitWriter.cpp:40: error: no matching function for call to ` __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<char, std::char_traits<char> >::stdio_filebuf(int&, std::_Ios_Openmode)' /usr/include/g++/ext/stdio_filebuf.h:53: error: candidates are: __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<char, std::char_traits<char> >::stdio_filebuf(const __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<c...

...Graph>() in the getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) of Hello2. 3.made the hello pass, it passed. 4.do "opt -load /llvm/lib/Debug/libhello.so -hello2 helloTheWorld.bc", and opt gives me: opt[0x85aaab8] opt[0x85aacc4] /lib/tls/libc.so.6[0x420275c8] opt(std::vector<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<llvm::Value* const, llvm::] opt(__gnu_cxx::hashtable<std::pair<llvm::Value* const, llvm::DSNodeHandle>, llv] opt(__gnu_cxx::hashtable<std::pair<llvm::Value* const, llvm::DSNodeHandle>, llv] opt(__gnu_cxx::hash_map<llvm::Value*, llvm::DSNodeHandl...

...:computeNodeMapping(const llvm::DSNodeHandle&, const llvm::DSNodeHandle&, llvm::DSGraph::NodeMapTy&, bool): Assertion `Entry.getNode() == N2 && "Inconsistent mapping detected!"' failed. The definition of the corresponding function is: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN9__gnu_cxx13new_allocatorIjE9constructEPjRKj(%"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator"* %this, i32* %__p, i32* %__val) align 2 The callsite is: call void @_ZN9__gnu_cxx13new_allocatorIjE9constructEPjRKj(%"class.__gnu_cxx::new_allocator"* %3, i32* %tmp10, i32* %tmp11) Does anybody have a clue wha...