Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "__global_cli".
2004 Jun 25
2
panic() panic() panic()
...and the systems still panic()ed.
If I don't start the zaptel driver, they don't panic. If I start the
zaptel driver, but don't start asterisk, they still panic. I'm at a
loss of what to try next.
A typical Call Trace from the panic message looks like:
wait_on_irq, [kernel] 0xde
__global_cli [kernel] 0x62
flush_to_ldisc [kernel] 0x126
__run_task_queue [kernel] 0x61
context_thread [kernel] 0x13b
context_thread [kernel] 0x0
context_thread [kernel] 0x0
kernel_thread_helper 0x5
Any ideas? Thanks...
2004 Apr 16
1
tor2 driver panics with 2 sticks of memory
...362 c023f916
Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: 00000000 f79ce6a4 f6a2bef8 c017f574 000004
00 00000005 000004bf 00008a31
Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: 7f1c0300 01000415 1a131100 170f1200 000000
00 f6a2a000 f782d978 f782d978
Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: Call Trace: [<c010a362>] __global_cli [kernel] 0x
e2
Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: [<c017f574>] change_termios [kernel] 0x24
Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: [<c017f844>] set_termios [kernel] 0x164
Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: [<c017c6e2>] tty_ioctl [kernel] 0x352
Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: [<c0151887>]...
2003 Jun 09
7
Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
Hi,
We are trying to validate Asterisk as a media gateway PRI <-> SIP with two
T400P (8 T1s) per box. The first
experience with BOX1 (Compaq, 2.53 GHz, 1 Gb RAM) and just one T400P was
encouraging - on the load
test with 3 T1s worth of calls we had on average 75% idle CPU.
Not so with BOX2 (Dell, single 2.6 GHz Xeon, 1 Gb RAM, 2 T400P) and BOX3
(Dell, dual 2.6 GHz Xeon,
2 Gb RAM, 2 T400P,