Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "__general_malloc".
2008 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
Sorry, for j
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:16 PM, David Vandevoorde
<daveed at vandevoorde.com> wrote:
>
> Another valid implementation of malloc is one that actually returns a
> non-null pointer in this case, and for such an implementation, a valid
> reduction is "int main() { return 1; }". That reduction is IMO not
> only valid, but also defensible and maybe
2008 May 01
3
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
On May 1, 2008, at 12:47 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 20:01, David Vandevoorde wrote:
>
>> Correct. It's an extreme form of garbage collection, I suppose ;-)
>>
>> (In theory, it can also be assumed to fail -- because an
>> implementation is allowed to make any call to malloc fail -- though
>> that's probably not useful.)
>