Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "__floatdisf".
Did you mean:
__floatdidf
2008 Jun 05
1
[LLVMdev] lli/JIT missing libgcc symbols on Mingw32/x86
...cmpdi2);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__divdi3);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__eprintf);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__fixdfdi);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__fixsfdi);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__fixunsdfdi);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__fixunssfdi);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__floatdidf);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__floatdisf);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__lshrdi3);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__moddi3);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__udivdi3);
+ EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__umoddi3);
#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(_alloca_probe);
#endif
@@ -157,6 +172,21 @@
{
EXPLICIT_SYMBOL(_alloca);
EXPLICIT_S...
2018 Sep 06
4
Clang for the PlayStation 2
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 13:31, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
> So the next step is to debug where Mips is producing those TruncIntFP
> nodes. There'll be some constraint it's not checking or an unexpected
> node type, probably related to -msingle-float. I'm afraid I'm not sure
> what yet.
>
I'm reasonably sure the function producing that
2001 Aug 15
0
libvorbis (sparc-solaris-2.8)
Please excuse me for posting to a list to which I am not subscribed.
I built libvorbis-1.0rc2 on sparc-solaris-2.8, using gcc-2.95.3, and
find that the library has unreferenced functions, specifically
__floatdidf and __floatdisf. I'd appreciate suggestions on how to
compile this library on this architecture so it is fully functional.
(Alas, since I don't subscribe, I'd appreciate a response by email.)
Thanks,
--
Ronald Florence http://members.home.net/18james
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.x...
2018 Sep 06
3
Clang for the PlayStation 2
...This is also a fairly common situation. If the operation can be
> emulated with a reasonably small number of native instructions you can
> often get LLVM to do that.
>
> In this case it would probably be a libcall though because it's quite
> complex. LLVM would generate a call to __floatdisf, which will be
> provided by compiler-rt (there are C implementations for all kinds of
> floating-point operations there).
>
> You should see the same thing if you compile a function doing that
> conversion with GCC.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Tim.
>
So I was rereading this; do...