search for: __floatdisf

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "__floatdisf".

Did you mean: __floatdidf
2008 Jun 05
1
[LLVMdev] lli/JIT missing libgcc symbols on Mingw32/x86
...cmpdi2); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__divdi3); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__eprintf); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__fixdfdi); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__fixsfdi); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__fixunsdfdi); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__fixunssfdi); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__floatdidf); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__floatdisf); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__lshrdi3); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__moddi3); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__udivdi3); + EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(__umoddi3); #elif defined(_MSC_VER) EXPLICIT_SYMBOL_DEF(_alloca_probe); #endif @@ -157,6 +172,21 @@ { EXPLICIT_SYMBOL(_alloca); EXPLICIT_S...
2018 Sep 06
4
Clang for the PlayStation 2
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 13:31, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > So the next step is to debug where Mips is producing those TruncIntFP > nodes. There'll be some constraint it's not checking or an unexpected > node type, probably related to -msingle-float. I'm afraid I'm not sure > what yet. > I'm reasonably sure the function producing that
2001 Aug 15
0
libvorbis (sparc-solaris-2.8)
Please excuse me for posting to a list to which I am not subscribed. I built libvorbis-1.0rc2 on sparc-solaris-2.8, using gcc-2.95.3, and find that the library has unreferenced functions, specifically __floatdidf and __floatdisf. I'd appreciate suggestions on how to compile this library on this architecture so it is fully functional. (Alas, since I don't subscribe, I'd appreciate a response by email.) Thanks, -- Ronald Florence http://members.home.net/18james --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.x...
2018 Sep 06
3
Clang for the PlayStation 2
...This is also a fairly common situation. If the operation can be > emulated with a reasonably small number of native instructions you can > often get LLVM to do that. > > In this case it would probably be a libcall though because it's quite > complex. LLVM would generate a call to __floatdisf, which will be > provided by compiler-rt (there are C implementations for all kinds of > floating-point operations there). > > You should see the same thing if you compile a function doing that > conversion with GCC. > > Cheers. > > Tim. > So I was rereading this; do...