search for: __fax

...Regards, Roger. -- If it''s there and you can see it, it''s REAL |___R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl | If it''s there and you can''t see it, it''s TRANSPARENT | Tel: +31-15-2137555 | If it''s not there and you can see it, it''s VIRTUAL |__FAX:_+31-15-2138217 | If it''s not there and you can''t see it, it''s GONE! -- Roy Wilks, 1983 |_____|

...ards, Roger Wolff. -- If it''s there and you can see it, it''s REAL |___R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl | If it''s there and you can''t see it, it''s TRANSPARENT | Tel: +31-15-2137555 | If it''s not there and you can see it, it''s VIRTUAL |__FAX:_+31-15-2138217 | If it''s not there and you can''t see it, it''s GONE! -- Roy Wilks, 1983 |_____|

...to lead to trouble. -- If it''s there and you can see it, it''s REAL |___R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl | If it''s there and you can''t see it, it''s TRANSPARENT | Tel: +31-15-2137555 | If it''s not there and you can see it, it''s VIRTUAL |__FAX:_+31-15-2138217 | If it''s not there and you can''t see it, it''s GONE! -- Roy Wilks, 1983 |_____|

This was posted not too long ago on sci.crypt... Enjoy... I think the most relevant information is near the top, but it''s all quite good... :-) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- There is no intrinsic difference between algorithm and data, the same information can be viewed as data in one context and as algorithm in another. Why then do so many people claim that encryption algorithms