Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "__e".
Did you mean:
__
2008 Jan 30
2
R-help going to become "subscriber-only"
...aking of spam messages into R-help (and
other mailing lists). Even though our filters catch > 99.9%
(probably even > 99.99%) of all the spam, our mail server has
now occasionally been blacklisted because of the R-help spams.
The consequence of this will be that .. before the weekend ..
only __e-mail addresses__ subscribed to R-help will be allowed to post to
R-help without any moderation, and we are even considering outright
rejection all non-subscribers, these latter decision coming
later.
Consequence:
Please subscribe to R-help __ at least in digest mode __
now, and ``spread the...
2013 Sep 04
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: Adding an optional association field to llvm.global_ctors
Hi Reid,
On 03/09/13 20:08, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr
> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>
> Hi Reid,
>
> On 26/08/13 23:43, Reid Kleckner wrote:
>
> To implement http://llvm.org/PR16959
> <http://llvm.org/bugs/show___bug.cgi?id=16959
>
2013 Sep 03
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: Adding an optional association field to llvm.global_ctors
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Reid,
>
> On 26/08/13 23:43, Reid Kleckner wrote:
>
>> To implement http://llvm.org/PR16959
>> <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_**bug.cgi?id=16959<http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16959>>,
>> I need to add a new field to
>>
>> global_ctors.
>>
>>
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking
2012 Apr 20
1
[PATCH] multiqueue: a hodge podge of things
...T_SYMBOL(blk_requeue_request);
-static void add_acct_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
- int where)
+static void add_acct_request(struct request *rq, int where)
{
+ struct blk_queue_ctx *ctx = rq->queue_ctx;
+
+ BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
drive_stat_acct(rq, 1);
- __elv_add_request(q, rq, where);
+ spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ __elv_add_request(rq, where);
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
static void part_round_stats_single(int cpu, struct hd_struct *part,
unsigned long now)
{
if (now == part->stamp)
return;
if (part_in_flight(par...
2012 Apr 20
1
[PATCH] multiqueue: a hodge podge of things
...T_SYMBOL(blk_requeue_request);
-static void add_acct_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
- int where)
+static void add_acct_request(struct request *rq, int where)
{
+ struct blk_queue_ctx *ctx = rq->queue_ctx;
+
+ BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
drive_stat_acct(rq, 1);
- __elv_add_request(q, rq, where);
+ spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ __elv_add_request(rq, where);
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
static void part_round_stats_single(int cpu, struct hd_struct *part,
unsigned long now)
{
if (now == part->stamp)
return;
if (part_in_flight(par...