Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "__debug_frame".
2008 Jun 21
3
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc -O0 compile times
...cc.s -> 8943786
llvm.s -> 13424378
gcc.o -> 2055892
llvm.o -> 3044512
Why is this? Lets look at the contents:
$ sdiff -w 120 gcc.size llvm.size
Segment : 1495968 | Segment : 2211617
Section (__TEXT, __text): 251661 | Section (__TEXT, __text):
290873
Section (__DWARF, __debug_frame): 82752 | Section (__DWARF,
__debug_frame): 80240
Section (__DWARF, __debug_info): 671478 | Section (__DWARF,
__debug_info): 1240778
Section (__DWARF, __debug_abbrev): 3241 | Section (__DWARF,
__debug_abbrev): 1535
Section (__DWARF, __debug_aranges): 48 | Section (__DWA...
2008 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc -O0 compile times
On Jun 21, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>
> $ sdiff -w 120 gcc.size llvm.size
> Segment : 1495968 | Segment : 2211617
> Section (__TEXT, __text): 251661 | Section (__TEXT, __text):
> 290873
> Section (__DWARF, __debug_frame): 82752 | Section (__DWARF,
> __debug_frame): 80240
> Section (__DWARF, __debug_info): 671478 | Section (__DWARF,
> __debug_info): 1240778
>
Are you sure the gcc numbers are right? I think these are gcc 4.0
numbers. I got:
Section (__TEXT, __text): 254569...
2008 Jun 27
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc -O0 compile times
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Evan Cheng wrote:
> Are you sure the gcc numbers are right? I think these are gcc 4.0 numbers. I
> got:
>
> Section (__TEXT, __text): 254569
> Section (__DWARF, __debug_frame): 82612
> Section (__DWARF, __debug_info): 841164
It is entirely possible they are 4.0 numbers, sorry I don't recall...
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/