Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "__debian__".
2019 Jan 30
2
[FORGED] r-base is already the newest version (3.5.2-1bionic)
...tatistical Computing
| > Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
|
| Ta-da!!!
|
| Was the problem essentially that I had been saying
|
| "sudo apt-get install r-base" rather than
|
| "sudo apt-get install r-base-core"?
No. One is a superset. A meta package.
These are all __Debian__ or __Ubuntu__ questions. Be patient, learn some
about your package manager.
And this is not the correct list for Debian or Ubuntu basics so it might be
polite of you to seek basic help elsewhere.
| Is it possible that the latter is needed if R has previously been
| installed from source, but ot...
2019 Jan 30
0
[FORGED] r-base is already the newest version (3.5.2-1bionic)
...bin/R, the man files, etc. (Which I had
likewise previously hidden away.)
This did *not* happen before when I did "sudo apt-get install r-base".
So there was a significant and important impact from installing what you
refer to as the "meta package".
>
> These are all __Debian__ or __Ubuntu__ questions. Be patient, learn some
> about your package manager.
I don't think so. I have work to do; I don't wish to spend my time
scrabbling around trying to find reliable and comprehensible
documentation. There is a huge amount of material on the web; much of
it is...
2019 Jan 29
2
[FORGED] r-base is already the newest version (3.5.2-1bionic)
Rolf,
I think it may help to read-up on dpkg and apt. Instead of 'whereis' do
dpkg -l r-base-core
to see the content of that package. Use
apt-cache policy r-base-core
to see what the package cache says about where it gets the package from. And
so on. Also
type -p R
which R
will tell where your system thinks R comes from. If you install R 3.5.2 you
should not see R 3.5.1.