search for: __c55x__

...future. The assembly definitions for the operators are only useful if you have gcc-like inline assembly. Otherwise, the explicit register loads will make it worse. > 2) Proper definitions for the speex types are required in the speex_types.h > file - I did this and you can enable it via a __C55X__ definition. File > attached. My definition follows the convention of other defines in this > file. It could be covered by the C55X_ASM define above, but the content of > this file is not going to have assembler in it. I leave it up to you if > think this is wrong or right - just tel...

...g mode). This can be enabled with a C55X_ASM definition following the ARM fixed point math definition convention, and some it could be converted to assembler in the future. 2) Proper definitions for the speex types are required in the speex_types.h file - I did this and you can enable it via a __C55X__ definition. File attached. My definition follows the convention of other defines in this file. It could be covered by the C55X_ASM define above, but the content of this file is not going to have assembler in it. I leave it up to you if think this is wrong or right - just tell me and I'll fo...

...; make it worse. I believe that Code Composer provides very good support for inline assembly, although I have not used it myself, and hope not to. >> 2) Proper definitions for the speex types are required in the >> speex_types.h >> file - I did this and you can enable it via a __C55X__ definition. File >> attached. My definition follows the convention of other defines in this >> file. It could be covered by the C55X_ASM define above, but the content >> of >> this file is not going to have assembler in it. I leave it up to you if >> think this is wro...