Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "__byte_order__".
Did you mean:
__byte_order
2001 Feb 27
4
Bad packet length in 2.5.1 with rijndael
it seems that this check does not work on solaris
#if BYTE_ORDER != LITTLE_ENDIAN
#define BYTE_SWAP
#endif
could you please check that BYTE_SWAP is defined
in rijndael.c
-m
2014 Feb 26
3
[LLVMdev] test-suite wrongly using big-endian results
On 26 February 2014 14:44, Robert Lytton <robert at xmos.com> wrote:
> This is related to a patch I submitted a little while ago (still pending):
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2760
>
> If accepted, would it make this patch (and a others) unnecessary?
Hi Robert,
It is, but hijacking your patch a little, why not use
__ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__? Why do we need to create
2014 Apr 04
3
[PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
On 04/04/2014 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
>> to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
>> equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:
>>
>>
2014 Apr 04
3
[PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
On 04/04/2014 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
>> to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
>> equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:
>>
>>
2016 Jul 13
2
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:48:51PM +0200, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev wrote:
> [ CCed all people who were involved in this thread ]
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> personally, I am interested to test the prebuilt-toolchains for
> Ubuntu/xenial alias 16.04 LTS and Debian/Jessie v8.5.0 AMD64.
> The available toolchains are incomplete and thus useless.
>
> Just as a fact: There is still no
2012 Jun 23
9
[PATCH 0/5] btrfs: lz4/lz4hc compression
WARNING: This is not compatible with the previous lz4 patchset. If you''re using
experimental compression that isn''t in mainline kernels, be prepared to backup
and restore or decompress before upgrading, and have backups in case it eats
data (which appears not to be a problem any more, but has been during
development).
These patches add lz4 and lz4hc compression
2012 Feb 13
10
[RFB] add LZ4 compression method to btrfs
Hi,
so here it is, LZ4 compression method inside btrfs. The patchset is based on
top of current Chris'' for-linus + Andi''s snappy implementation + the fixes from
Li Zefan. Passes xfstests and stresstests.
I haven''t measured performance on wide range of hardware or workloads, rather
wanted to publish the patches before I get distracted again. I''d like to ask
2013 Oct 26
2
[PATCH] 1. changes for vdiskadm on illumos based platform
...ine if you know your architecture endianess.
+ */
+#if (defined(__BIG_ENDIAN__) || defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) || \
+ defined(_BIG_ENDIAN) || defined(_ARCH_PPC) || defined(__PPC__) || \
+ defined(__PPC) || defined(PPC) || defined(__powerpc__) || \
+ defined(__powerpc) || defined(powerpc) || \
+ ((defined(__BYTE_ORDER__)&&(__BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__))))
+#define LZ4_BIG_ENDIAN 1
+#else
+ /*
+ * Little Endian assumed. PDP Endian and other very rare endian format
+ * are unsupported.
+ */
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Compiler Options
+ */
+#if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L /* C99 */
+/* "restrict&q...
2017 Jun 21
6
RFC: Cleaning up the Itanium demangler
...t - 'a' + 10);
+ ++t;
+ unsigned d0 = isdigit(*t) ? static_cast<unsigned>(*t - '0') :
+ static_cast<unsigned>(*t - 'a' + 10);
+ *e = static_cast<char>((d1 << 4) + d0);
+ }
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+ std::reverse(buf, e);
+#endif
+ char num[float_data<Float>::max_demangled_size] = {0};
+ int n = snprintf(num, sizeof(num), float_data<Float>::spec, value);
+ s += string_ref(num, num + n);
+ }
+ }
+};
+...