Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "__builtin_va_arg_pack".
2013 Oct 16
1
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply?
The __builtin_va_arg_pack() and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() builtins are useful in this context and, unlike __builtin_apply(), are possible to implement correctly in the general case. I believe that some GNU system headers use them when they are available, so they are probably worth supporting.
I'd love to see __built...
2013 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply?
I would also like so tee support for __builtin_apply*. We use it in
macros and such.
If others are interested, please speak up.
-Jan
On 02/10/2013 20:51, Patrik Hägglund H wrote:
> Indeed. However, I wouldn't have called variable number of arguments a "sophisticated feature". :-)
>
> /Patrik Hägglund
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at
2013 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply?
Indeed. However, I wouldn't have called variable number of arguments a "sophisticated feature". :-)
/Patrik Hägglund
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Parzyszek
Sent: den 2 oktober 2013 19:12
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] builtin_apply?
I think varargs functions would