Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "__aeabi_mempcy".
Did you mean:
__aeabi_memcpy
2016 Apr 11
3
compler-rt, __aeabi_memcpy () possibly broken (ARM)
On 11 April 2016 at 02:43, Renato Golin via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> This is standard AAPCS, I trully hope neither glibc, newlib or musl's
> implementations will corrupt anything more.
Normal AAPCS functions are allowed to corrupt d0-d7 and d16-d31, but
the RTABI seems pretty explicit that these functions aren't. I think
we've got a real problem here.