Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "__acoshf128_finite".
Did you mean:
__acosf128_finite
2020 Oct 05
2
LLJIT: __{math}_finite symbols not resolved ?
...necessary to specifically link against
libm where these __finite symbols reside:
$ nm -D /usr/lib/libm.so.6 | grep finite
0000000000050540 T __acosf128_finite at GLIBC_2.26
0000000000042f70 T __acosf_finite at GLIBC_2.15
0000000000026940 i __acos_finite at GLIBC_2.15
0000000000051000 T __acoshf128_finite at GLIBC_2.26
0000000000043240 T __acoshf_finite at GLIBC_2.15
)
but maybe it needs some help on that regard ?
Thanks for your quick answer,
Jean-Michaël
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:53 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jean-Michaël,
>
> How are you trying to provide...
2020 Oct 05
2
LLJIT: __{math}_finite symbols not resolved ?
...ese __finite symbols reside:
>>
>> $ nm -D /usr/lib/libm.so.6 | grep finite
>> 0000000000050540 T __acosf128_finite at GLIBC_2.26
>> 0000000000042f70 T __acosf_finite at GLIBC_2.15
>> 0000000000026940 i __acos_finite at GLIBC_2.15
>> 0000000000051000 T __acoshf128_finite at GLIBC_2.26
>> 0000000000043240 T __acoshf_finite at GLIBC_2.15
>> )
>> but maybe it needs some help on that regard ?
>>
>> Thanks for your quick answer,
>>
>> Jean-Michaël
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:53 PM Lang Hames <lhames...
2020 Oct 05
2
LLJIT: __{math}_finite symbols not resolved ?
Hello,
when building code with -Ofast -ffinite-math-only -ffast-math, clang
generates calls to "finite" variants of math functions.
This has been the source of a fair amount of issues in a "normal", non-JIT
pipeline, which seem to have been fixed over time - a simple fix being
recompiling the target app against the new glibc.
- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44842
-