Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "__acosf_finite".
Did you mean:
__acos_finite
2020 Oct 05
2
LLJIT: __{math}_finite symbols not resolved ?
...have no trouble finding every other libc / libm / libc++ / ...
symbol so I assumed that it was not necessary to specifically link against
libm where these __finite symbols reside:
$ nm -D /usr/lib/libm.so.6 | grep finite
0000000000050540 T __acosf128_finite at GLIBC_2.26
0000000000042f70 T __acosf_finite at GLIBC_2.15
0000000000026940 i __acos_finite at GLIBC_2.15
0000000000051000 T __acoshf128_finite at GLIBC_2.26
0000000000043240 T __acoshf_finite at GLIBC_2.15
)
but maybe it needs some help on that regard ?
Thanks for your quick answer,
Jean-Michaƫl
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:53 PM Lang...
2020 Oct 05
2
LLJIT: __{math}_finite symbols not resolved ?
...bc++ /
>> ... symbol so I assumed that it was not necessary to specifically link
>> against libm where these __finite symbols reside:
>>
>> $ nm -D /usr/lib/libm.so.6 | grep finite
>> 0000000000050540 T __acosf128_finite at GLIBC_2.26
>> 0000000000042f70 T __acosf_finite at GLIBC_2.15
>> 0000000000026940 i __acos_finite at GLIBC_2.15
>> 0000000000051000 T __acoshf128_finite at GLIBC_2.26
>> 0000000000043240 T __acoshf_finite at GLIBC_2.15
>> )
>> but maybe it needs some help on that regard ?
>>
>> Thanks for your quic...
2020 Oct 05
2
LLJIT: __{math}_finite symbols not resolved ?
Hello,
when building code with -Ofast -ffinite-math-only -ffast-math, clang
generates calls to "finite" variants of math functions.
This has been the source of a fair amount of issues in a "normal", non-JIT
pipeline, which seem to have been fixed over time - a simple fix being
recompiling the target app against the new glibc.
- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44842
-