Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "____asan_handle_no_return_veneer".
2014 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Remaining Compiler-RT failures in ARM
...014b4a4 <+208>: ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0xfff99bda
For context, the code is:
0x001d8e5c <+232>: mov r0, r4
0x001d8e60 <+236>: bl 0x2ec4f0 <____asan_report_store4_veneer>
0x001d8e64 <+240>: str r0, [r4]
0x001d8e68 <+244>: bl 0x2ec488 <____asan_handle_no_return_veneer>
0x001d8e6c <+248>: andeq r1, r0, r4, asr #23
0x001d8e70 <+252>: andseq r0, r10, r12, ror #4
0x001d8e74 <+256>: andeq r1, r0, r12, ror r7
0x001d8e78 <+260>: andseq r0, r10, r0, lsr r2
=> 0x001d8e7c <+264>: ; <UNDEFINED> instruction: 0xfffa45ba...
2014 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Remaining Compiler-RT failures in ARM
On 10 October 2014 15:30, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote:
> Could this be some kind of linker-generated compatibility magic?
I'm not sure. Searching for "____asan_handle_no_return_veneer" on
Google gets me this thread. :)
I'm tempted to disable that test on ARM+Linux, since we use EHABI
instead of SjLj... At least for now...
--renato
2014 Oct 09
4
[LLVMdev] Remaining Compiler-RT failures in ARM
Folks,
As of this run:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-full/builds/746
There are three classes of failures that need fixing before we get the
bot green:
1. AddressSanitizer.BuiltinLongJmpTest Unit Test
Two configurations fail:
* Asan-arm-inline-Test
* Asan-arm-with-calls-Test
I wonder what's the best way to run it individually and reduce the
error. I'm not