Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_79".
Did you mean:
79
2006 Feb 28
0
Re: Echo and other reasons to migrate to BRI from POTS? Was (Echo on PRI/BRI?)
...he gains and get them tuned, and now the echo only leaves very
small artifacts. Nonetheless, this still provokes the odd complaint here and
there. We use VOIP for outgoing calls when our POTS lines are congested, and
we find zero echo during those calls. Therefore, I assume that our handsets
(Cisco _79[46]0's) handle echo properly, and the source is our local loop.
I suppose then I cannot promise that migrating to a pair of BRI circuits (4
channels) will eliminate echo. It would be safe to say that echo would
PROBABLY be eliminated?
Other reasons to migrate: eliminate static/line noise (fro...
2006 Feb 28
1
Re: Echo and other reasons to migrate to BRI
...he gains and get them tuned, and now the echo only leaves very
small artifacts. Nonetheless, this still provokes the odd complaint here and
there. We use VOIP for outgoing calls when our POTS lines are congested, and
we find zero echo during those calls. Therefore, I assume that our handsets
(Cisco _79[46]0's) handle echo properly, and the source is our local loop.
I suppose then I cannot promise that migrating to a pair of BRI circuits (4
channels) will eliminate echo. It would be safe to say that echo would
PROBABLY be eliminated?
Other reasons to migrate: eliminate static/line noise (fro...