Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9ff4d5b".
Did you mean:
9ff45
2009 Mar 30
0
[PATCH] x86: disable stack-protector for __restore_processor_state()
...un Heo <tj at kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <49D13385.5060900 at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/power/Makefile | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/Makefile b/arch/x86/power/Makefile
index 9ff4d5b..58b32db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/power/Makefile
@@ -1,2 +1,7 @@
+# __restore_processor_state() restores %gs after S3 resume and so should not
+# itself be stack-protected
+nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
+CFLAGS_cpu_$(BITS).o := $(nostackp)
+
obj-$(C...
2009 Mar 30
0
[PATCH] x86: disable stack-protector for __restore_processor_state()
...un Heo <tj at kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <49D13385.5060900 at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/power/Makefile | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/Makefile b/arch/x86/power/Makefile
index 9ff4d5b..58b32db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/power/Makefile
@@ -1,2 +1,7 @@
+# __restore_processor_state() restores %gs after S3 resume and so should not
+# itself be stack-protected
+nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
+CFLAGS_cpu_$(BITS).o := $(nostackp)
+
obj-$(C...