search for: 9ff4d5b

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9ff4d5b".

Did you mean: 9ff45
2009 Mar 30
0
[PATCH] x86: disable stack-protector for __restore_processor_state()
...un Heo <tj at kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <49D13385.5060900 at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte.hu> --- arch/x86/power/Makefile | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/power/Makefile b/arch/x86/power/Makefile index 9ff4d5b..58b32db 100644 --- a/arch/x86/power/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/power/Makefile @@ -1,2 +1,7 @@ +# __restore_processor_state() restores %gs after S3 resume and so should not +# itself be stack-protected +nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector) +CFLAGS_cpu_$(BITS).o := $(nostackp) + obj-$(C...
2009 Mar 30
0
[PATCH] x86: disable stack-protector for __restore_processor_state()
...un Heo <tj at kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <49D13385.5060900 at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte.hu> --- arch/x86/power/Makefile | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/power/Makefile b/arch/x86/power/Makefile index 9ff4d5b..58b32db 100644 --- a/arch/x86/power/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/power/Makefile @@ -1,2 +1,7 @@ +# __restore_processor_state() restores %gs after S3 resume and so should not +# itself be stack-protected +nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector) +CFLAGS_cpu_$(BITS).o := $(nostackp) + obj-$(C...