Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "9fc7".
Did you mean:
9f97
2003 Sep 27
1
Continuing Budgetone woes
...---------- next part --------------
Sip read:
INVITE sip:8@192.168.1.10 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.21
From: "BC IP Phone" <sip:btel@192.168.1.10>;tag=c3cedeba-47c2-6790-8eb4-5b15010f6079
To: <sip:8@192.168.1.10>
Contact: <sip:btel@192.168.1.21>
Call-ID: 95eae8bb-9fc7-1f5d-bb7d-23eddebaf21c@192.168.1.21
CSeq: 39684 INVITE
User-Agent: Grandstream SIP UA 1.0.3.81
Max-Forwards: 70
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 257
v=0
o=btel 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.1.21
s=-
c=IN IP4 192.168.1.21
t=...
2025 Jan 21
0
Flac Digest, Vol 117, Issue 4
...ere is a duplicate tag (one with a value and one with no value).
> Case explained to me that a duplicate tag is not necessarily unwanted.
> [cid:fc74d701-df5b-496d-b73b-ce2db2ce3ba6]
> From within dBpoweramp I deleted the SONG RATING tag (2nd from the bottom)
> [cid:424e371a-639e-4044-9fc7-b8fc7db2c69a]
>
> Then re-run the same metaflac command
> metaflac --show-tag="Song Rating" --show-tag=SongRating WorkingMan.flac
> I now see:
> [cid:32e3247e-e942-4359-9e8c-0756866324dc]
>
> That not only removed the tag that I actually wanted to delete, it also
>...
2017 Oct 20
2
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
...ID=S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-3271483883-1121>;CN=test_share,OU=Test,DC=modianoad,DC=testdomainDC=com
memberOf:
<GUID=1a3277cf-62cd-4b0f-bd2a-e898a2b3fff2>;<SID=S-1-5-32-551>;CN=Backup
Operators,CN=Builtin,DC=modianoad,DC=testdomainDC=com
memberOf:
<GUID=50cae1b4-168a-43e6-9fc7-43fa7cd7e8a3>;<SID=S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-3271483883-1111>;CN=noc,CN=Users,DC=modianoad,DC=testdomainDC=com
lastLogonTimestamp: 131528901605870470
primaryGroupID: 513
lastLogon: 131529690266506010
logonCount: 389
msDS-KeyVersionNumber: 95
msDS-User-Account-Control-Compu...
2025 Jan 19
3
Duplicate Tag
Hi Dave,
I haven't reviewed metaflac to see whether its algorithm might incorrectly show a tag twice. It's possible that dBpoweramp appended a tag that already existed. I imagine that if metaflac says there's an occurrence of the tag with no value, and another with a value, then that's probably accurate. Can you show the output of metaflac? That might help verify.
You could use