search for: 9f840692

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9f840692".

Did you mean: 6f740692
2020 Sep 09
2
[RFC] New Feature Proposal: De-Optimizing Cold Functions using PGO Info
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 14:27, Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com> wrote: > A more aesthetic comment I have is that personally, I would prefer a > single option with a default percentage (say 0%) rather than having to > specify two options. > 0% doesn't mean "don't do it", just means "only do that to functions I didn't see running at
2020 Sep 09
2
[RFC] New Feature Proposal: De-Optimizing Cold Functions using PGO Info
...get this behaviour from the same flag, as you need to provide a default value if the flag isn't passed (usually boolean or integer, not both). > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200909/9f840692/attachment.html>