Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9f840692".
Did you mean:
6f740692
2020 Sep 09
2
[RFC] New Feature Proposal: De-Optimizing Cold Functions using PGO Info
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 14:27, Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com>
wrote:
> A more aesthetic comment I have is that personally, I would prefer a
> single option with a default percentage (say 0%) rather than having to
> specify two options.
>
0% doesn't mean "don't do it", just means "only do that to functions I
didn't see running at
2020 Sep 09
2
[RFC] New Feature Proposal: De-Optimizing Cold Functions using PGO Info
...get this behaviour from the same flag, as you
need to provide a default value if the flag isn't passed (usually boolean
or integer, not both).
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200909/9f840692/attachment.html>