search for: 9f1b

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "9f1b".

Did you mean: 1f1b
2019 Oct 02
5
Removed a DC but...
On 02/10/2019 13:52, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix > Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. > > search for : > CN=58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f > And > CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75 > > In _msdc.dom.tld. > Verify which GUID is removed, you can see that, then remove the old server GUID. > > Run : > dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it > dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it > >...
2019 Oct 02
3
Removed a DC but...
Hai, The steps shown here dont work? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC If that is the case and you besides that free of errors. Then upgrade, and try again once your on at least samba 4.9 or 4.10. As im hoping you are upgrade straight to Buster. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. search for : CN=58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f And CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75 In _msdc.dom.tld. Verify which GUID is removed, you can see that, then remove the old server GUID. Run : dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it To see the name of the server, then yo...
2019 Oct 02
2
Removed a DC but...
...>> Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. >> Yes, but why wasn't it removed in the first place ? > [...] >>> Run : >>> dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it >>> dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it > Effectively these CNAME return nothing. > > can i safely run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix'? I do not see any reason why not. > > >> Which method was used to demote the DC, standard demote or with >> --demote-other-dead-...
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
...9051-0882-40ec-bf6e-b223e4adecd8>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=VDCUD1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it Not removing dangling forward link ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica-Locations in object CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it - <GUID=f060b28c-e27e-45f0-89c1-527474a6919c>;<RMD_ADDTIME=131533251720000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=131533251720000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=bc3f89e3-8ce4-4ddd-956a-ea740e8b2f12>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=6...
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
...cross-ncs --fix > > Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following. > Yes, but why wasn't it removed in the first place ? [...] > > Run : > > dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it > > dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it Effectively these CNAME return nothing. can i safely run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix'? > Which method was used to demote the DC, standard demote or with > --demote-other-dead-dc ? Standard. I've followed the wiki page, eg: https:/...