search for: 9f083950

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9f083950".

Did you mean: 90839350
2013 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Internal command line options should not be statically initialized.
...ons. We already have some manual name mangling/namespacification of options (e.g. -tail-dup-limit=). Perhaps we should formalize this somehow? -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130918/9f083950/attachment.html>
2013 Sep 17
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Internal command line options should not be statically initialized.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > Wait, I have a terrible idea. Why don't we roll our own .init_array style > appending section? I think we can make this work for all toolchains we > support. > Andy and I talked about this, but I don't think its worth it. My opinion is: 1. For tool options (the top-level llc, opt, llvm-as