Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9f083950".
Did you mean:
90839350
2013 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Internal command line options should not be statically initialized.
...ons. We already have some manual name mangling/namespacification of options (e.g. -tail-dup-limit=). Perhaps we should formalize this somehow?
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130918/9f083950/attachment.html>
2013 Sep 17
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Internal command line options should not be statically initialized.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> Wait, I have a terrible idea. Why don't we roll our own .init_array style
> appending section? I think we can make this work for all toolchains we
> support.
>
Andy and I talked about this, but I don't think its worth it. My opinion is:
1. For tool options (the top-level llc, opt, llvm-as