Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9ef9b48e".
2016 Jun 14
3
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
...e, and then we'll have a version 4.0. Until then,
> unless something else breaking comes up, 3.10 sounds fine to me.
>
+1, complete agreement.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160614/9ef9b48e/attachment.html>
2016 Jun 13
11
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
Breaking this out into a separate thread since it's kind of a separate
issue, and to make sure people see it.
If you have opinions on this, please chime in. I'd like to collect as
many arguments here as possible to make a good decision. The main
contestants are 4.0 and 3.10, and I've seen folks being equally
surprised by both.
Brain-dump so far:
- After LLVM 1.9 came 2.0, and after