Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9ee520ee".
Did you mean:
93ee5208e
2020 Apr 08
3
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
Hi All,
Throwing a couple of comments in:
Chris's position here has a lot of good points and we want to make sure
we're not raising the barrier too high. I definitely want to be able to
push ahead with our versions of tools; being able to update quickly is one
of the hallmarks of the llvm project. That said, binary packages that can
be updated are a minimal first step IMO. I'd really
2020 Apr 08
3
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
...Th3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=OUvi60kOTuMyRUJcCtHsN-RK1gHy4sXxEGS0pAunCoE&s=W77RObkJ6AlX4-NZ-OApzF80Y5rSjh4gDzuBG4ScjEQ&e=>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200408/9ee520ee/attachment-0001.html>