Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9ec69bc2".
Did you mean:
9e69bc1
2005 Mar 01
0
memory usage
...it does mean that encoding is
almost 6x as expensive as decoding, so expect that you're going to use
60-90% of your CPU for speex encode..
-SteveK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20050301/9ec69bc2/attachment.html
2005 Feb 28
4
memory usage
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 19:42 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> > jean-marc: i think we can remove spx_sig_t *orig.
> > but am not sure about exc2Buf. is it for extension?
>
> orig is already removed in SVN (which you should probably use). As for
> exc2, it can be removed, but I'm not sure if you can just use exc
> instead (maybe yes).
>
when removing "spx_sig_t