search for: 9e9

...oblem is that the conversion to POSIXlt is failing. The best solution would be to extend the whole POSIXlt-class, but that?s too much work. I?ve done some experiments, and it also seems that the Date class can store larger values than POSIXlt: > as.Date(8e9, origin='1970-01-01')==as.Date(9e9, origin='1970-01-01') [1] FALSE > as.POSIXlt(as.Date(8e9, origin='1970-01-01'))==as.POSIXlt(as.Date(9e9, origin='1970-01-01')) [1] TRUE > as.POSIXlt(as.Date(8e9, origin='1970-01-01')) [1] "-5877641-06-23 UTC" # Same for 9e9 > as.Date(8e9, origin=...

Emil et al., On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:08 AM, Emil Bode <emil.bode at dans.knaw.nl> wrote: > I don't think there's much wrong with is.na(as_date(Inf, > origin='1970-01-01'))==FALSE, as there still is some "non-NA-ness" about > the value (as difftime shows), but that the output when printing is > confusing. The way cat is treating it is clearer: it

...he conversion to POSIXlt is failing. > The best solution would be to extend the whole POSIXlt-class, but that?s too much work. > I?ve done some experiments, and it also seems that the Date class can store larger values than POSIXlt: > > as.Date(8e9, origin='1970-01-01')==as.Date(9e9, origin='1970-01-01') > [1] FALSE > > as.POSIXlt(as.Date(8e9, origin='1970-01-01'))==as.POSIXlt(as.Date(9e9, origin='1970-01-01')) > [1] TRUE > > as.POSIXlt(as.Date(8e9, origin='1970-01-01')) > [1] "-5877641-06-23 UTC" > # Same for 9...

...,#8P7S4R-3(B#0HJ0UA?0S)$7T--64M3;W5R8V4@ M4W!I<F5$0S@P,#`O4W!I<F5$0S@P,#`Z("(E4T-)4%!$.B!$1D4@3TU?4V]U M<F-E0TU92R!00E\X,#@P(@T**D-87T,R1%]#35E+4V]U<F-E(%-P:7)E1$,S M-3,U+U-P:7)E1$,S-3,U.B`B)5-#25!01#H@1$9%($]-7U-O=7)C94--64L@ M4$)?,S4S-2(-"BI#6%]#,D1?0TU92U-O=7)C92!3:&5E=$9E9$]F9G-E="]3 M:&5E=$9E9$]F9G-E="`H5%(P,#0I.B`B)5-#25!01#H@1$9%($]-7U-O=7)C M94--64L@4$)?5%(P,#0B#0HJ0VQO<V5523H@*D-87T,R1%]#35E+4V]U<F-E M#0H-"BI/<&5N54D@*D-87T,R1%]/=71P=710<F]F:6QE+T1E<W1I;F%T:6]N M(%!R;V9I;&4Z(%!I8VM/;F4-"BI/<F1E<D1E<&5N9...