Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9e85".
Did you mean:
985
2006 Feb 27
1
Asttapi - what's wrong?
...is available to answer at this time (1:0/0/0)
-- Executing Hangup("SIP/341-062e", "") in new stack
== Spawn extension (sip, 00989970434, 2) exited non-zero on 'SIP/341-062e'
== Manager 'tomo' logged off from 10.0.0.203
-- Executing Dial("SIP/341-9e85", "OOH323/0989970434@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx") in new s
tack
-- Called 0989970434@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
-- OOH323/85.114.35.42-b1b4 is ringing
== Spawn extension (sip, 00989970434, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/341-9e85'
2013 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 112, Issue 56
...21 Oct 2013 11:18:46 -0700
From: Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com>
To: Dmitry Babokin <babokin at gmail.com>
Cc: Ilia Filippov <ili.filippov at gmail.com>, LLVM Developers Mailing
List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Bug #16941
Message-ID: <567CDFA6-9E85-4943-869C-1C471B2143D8 at apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Dmitry,
ISPC does some instruction selection as part of vectorization (on ASTs!) by placing intrinsics for specific operations. The SEXT to i32 pattern was implemented because LLVM did not support...