Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9e094685".
2018 Jan 19
1
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...nsides of using -mllvm
-emit-codeview-ghash-section and /DEBUG:GHASH (aside from a small increase
in object file size). But if you find any let me know.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180119/9e094685/attachment.html>
2018 Jan 19
0
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
Zachary,
Do you generally recommend using -mllvm -emit-codeview-ghash-section and
/DEBUG:GHASH when linking for Windows?
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> -lldb-dev, +llvm-dev
>
> lldb-dev is specifically for the llvm debugger, and llvm-dev is for
> everything else (including lld)
>
> Did you compile the
2018 Jan 19
4
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
-lldb-dev, +llvm-dev
lldb-dev is specifically for the llvm debugger, and llvm-dev is for
everything else (including lld)
Did you compile the object files with clang and use -mllvm
-emit-codeview-ghash-section?
It sounds like probably not. If you don’t do that /DEBUG:GHASH will indeed
be much slower. I wonder if we should emit a linker diagnostic in this case
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:09 PM