search for: 9e

Once upon a time, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> said: > "We recommend that OEMs, cloud service providers, system > manufacturers, software vendors and end users stop deployment of > current versions." Current versions of what? Microcode? Well, that's the only thing Intel provides for CPUs, so that's all it can be. > What these means for people who

...;ve created the matrix of eigenvectors, but I may be wrong in this suspicion. I defer to the collective wisdom of the community, and hope that minds greater than mine may provide insight. Cheers, Corey > dput(trans_matrix) structure(c(0.9426, 0.0047, 0, 4e-04, 0, 5e-04, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9e-04, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.0308, 0.8205, 0.0254, 4e-04, 9e-04, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4e-04, 0.0016, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.021, 0.1291, 0.7978, 0.034, 0.0043, 0.0025, 0.0011, 3e-04, 9e-04, 4e-04, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.0056, 0.0394, 0.1174, 0.8366, 0.0509, 0.0094, 0.0023, 0.0022, 0.0014, 0.0017, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,...

...0ms rate 80Kbit [ ok ] * - tc class add dev wivl4 parent 5:46 classid 5:48 hfsc ls m2 472.0Kbit ul m2 472.0Kbit ... [ ok ] * - tc class add dev wivl4 parent 5:46 classid 5:49 hfsc rt m2 236.00Kbit ls m2 472.0Kbit ul m2 944Kbit ... [ ok ] * - Adding rules to classify traffic for 00:05:9e:80:e1:3b ... * - iptables -A macfilter -m mac --mac-source 00:05:9e:80:e1:3b ... [ ok ] * - iptables -A macfilter_nat -t nat -m mac --mac-source 00:05:9e:80:e1:3b ... [ ok ] * - Adding rules to flag VoIP traffic ... * - iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p udp -m mac...

...2 20 2 7 D1D1 0.7 0.10 7e-04 -3.154902 120 64 2 8 D1D1 0.7 0.10 7e-04 -3.154902 116 7 4 9 D1D1 0.8 0.10 8e-04 -3.096910 35 15 1 10 D1D1 0.8 0.10 8e-04 -3.096910 78 47 2 11 D1D1 0.8 0.10 8e-04 -3.096910 120 73 3 12 D1D1 0.9 0.10 9e-04 -3.045757 32 19 1 13 D1D1 0.9 0.10 9e-04 -3.045757 87 57 2 14 D1D1 0.9 0.10 9e-04 -3.045757 119 78 3 15 D1D1 0.9 0.10 9e-04 -3.045757 116 14 4 16 D1D1 1.0 0.10 1e-03 -3.000000 33 26 1 17 D1D1 1.0 0.10 1e-03 -3.000000 83 67 2 18 D1D...

...ws Browser Protocol No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 11 8.162855 192.168.1.105 128.118.25.3 NTP NTP client Frame 11 (90 bytes on wire, 90 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Intel_6d:d7:6a (00:04:23:6d:d7:6a), Dst: Cisco-Li_d0:46:9e (00:0c:41:d0:46:9e) Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.1.105 (192.168.1.105), Dst: 128.118.25.3 (128.118.25.3) User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: ntp (123), Dst Port: ntp (123) Network Time Protocol No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 12 8.209652 128.1...

Hi, Has anybody noticed that tcng-9e cannot be compiled on RedHat 9? The error is in the tcsim directory, with error message shown below, -------------------------------------------------- ./setup.klib sed: -e expression #1, char 61: Invalid range end make[1]: *** [klib/.ready] Error 1 -----------------------------------------------...

...is not creating tap interface but tun interface. I've tried this on both CentOS5 and CentOS6 and they both work as advertised! Downgrading the OS is not an option! CentOS5/6 gives me: ****************** tap1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 500 link/ether 9e:9e:44:9e:49:4c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff CentOS7 gives me: **************** tun1: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT qlen 500 link/none So, what's broken in 7 - or is it that it requires something different? Cheers, ak. [0]: http://la11111.wordpre...

...implemented in the party package by calling varimp(..., > conditional=TRUE). Unfortunately, when I call that on my forest I > receive > the error: > >> varimp(myforest, conditional=TRUE) > Error in model.matrix.default(as.formula(f), data = blocks) : > term 1 would require 9e+12 columns > > Does anyone know what is wrong? > Hi Jason, the particular feature doesn't scale well in its current implementation. Anyway, thanks for looking up previous reports closely. I can offer to have a look at your data if you send them along with the code to reproduce the...

...and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-7a-01 differ > Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-8e-09 and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-8e-09 differ > Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-8e-0a and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-8e-0a differ > Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-9e-09 and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-9e-09 differ > Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-9e-0a and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-9e-0a differ > Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-9e-0b and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-9e-0b differ > Files microcode-20171117/microcode.d...

...ucode/06-7a-01 and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-7a-01 differ Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-8e-09 and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-8e-09 differ Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-8e-0a and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-8e-0a differ Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-9e-09 and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-9e-09 differ Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-9e-0a and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-9e-0a differ Files microcode-20171117/intel-ucode/06-9e-0b and microcode-20180108/intel-ucode/06-9e-0b differ Files microcode-20171117/microcode.dat and microcod...

...ble importance measure. This is implemented in the party package by calling varimp(..., conditional=TRUE). Unfortunately, when I call that on my forest I receive the error: > varimp(myforest, conditional=TRUE) Error in model.matrix.default(as.formula(f), data = blocks) : term 1 would require 9e+12 columns Does anyone know what is wrong? I noticed a post in June 2011 where a user reported this message and the ultimate problem was that the importance measure was being conditioned on too many variables (47). I have only a small number of variables here so I guessed that was not the problem...

...icate outside via a proxy, and Squid's logs show: ... 1581432434.501????? 0 10.5.8.17 TAG_NONE/400 4064? %C5/%B6* - HIER_NONE/- text/html 1581432497.231????? 0 10.5.8.17 TAG_NONE/400 4570 NONE error:invalid-request - HIER_NONE/- text/html 1581432497.338????? 0 10.5.8.17 TAG_NONE/400 4300? %AC%9E%D0Rj%84%19%8D%23O%F9%E5%D4%E9%DBj%8D%F9x%C3:%FB-%02f%FBE%E5O%92c%9A - HIER_NONE/- text/html 1581432497.445????? 0 10.5.8.17 TAG_NONE/400 4570 NONE error:invalid-request - HIER_NONE/- text/html 1581432497.552????? 0 10.5.8.17 TAG_NONE/400 4570 NONE error:invalid-request - HIER_NONE/- text/html 15814...

...lt;br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18 03<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18 03 a9<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18 03 a9 83<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18 03 a9 83 9e<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18 03 a9 83 9e 79<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18 03 a9 83 9e 79 01<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18 03 a9 83 9e 79 01 80<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 00 46 18 03 a9 83 9e 79 01 80 ]<br> > [00 01 04 04 08 02 00 0...

I made other tests. It's not a matter of Win98 versus WinXP, things change passing from tftpd32 v310beta to v3.33. This version seems to work fine, but the logs show problems. Here is the complete log with pxelinux 3.82-pre4: Rcvd DHCP Discover Msg for IP 0.0.0.0, Mac 00:1E: 68:A6:9E:A9 [05/06 18:24:43.816] DHCP: proposed address 192.168.1.20 [05/06 18:24:43.816] 1356 Request 2 not processed [05/06 18:24:43.886] Rcvd DHCP Rqst Msg for IP 0.0.0.0, Mac 00:1E:68:A6:9E:A9 [05/06 18:24: 46.009] Previously allocated address 192.168.1.20 acked [05/06 18:24: 46.019] Connection receiv...

...g listening state Nov 28 19:31:54 servus kernel: br0: port 2(eth2) entering learning state Nov 28 19:32:09 servus kernel: br0: topology change detected, propagating Nov 28 19:32:09 servus kernel: br0: port 2(eth2) entering forwarding state Nov 28 19:32:18 servus dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:08:a1:19:9e:b1 via br0 Nov 28 19:32:18 servus dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.11.2 to 00:08:a1:19:9e:b1 via br0 Nov 28 19:32:18 servus dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.11.2 from 00:08:a1:19:9e:b1 via br0 Nov 28 19:32:18 servus dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.11.2 to 00:08:a1:19:9e:b1 via br0 Thanks, Coen -------------...

...b:row:scope:msgs:all)(81=subject)(82=sender)(83=message-id) (84=references)(85=recipients)(86=date)(87=size)(88=flags)(89=priority) ...<schnipp>...... (AE=folderName)(AF=charSet)(B0=charSetOverride)(B1=lastPurgeTime)> <(80=1)(81=INBOX.Junk)(9D=Mon Sep 01 14:33:00 2003)> {1:^9E {(k^9F:c)(s=9u)} [1(^AC=1)(^AD81)(^B1^9D)(^A9=1)(^AA=1)]} @$${1{@ {-1:^80 {(k96:c)(s=9)} } {-FFFFFFFD:^99 {(k98:c)(s=9)} } <(9E=Mon Sep 01 14:38:00 2003)>[1:^9E(^B1^9E)] @$$}1}@ ...<schnipp>...... @$${9{@ @$$}9}@ [2003/09/01 14:59:26, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(636) elac...

...rying to get file: /tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/44454c4c-4700-104d-805a-cac04f5a4c32 Apr 2 19:56:54 helium tftpd[3372496]: tftpd: trying to get file: /tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/44454c4c-4700-104d-805a-cac04f5a4c32 Apr 2 19:57:08 helium tftpd[3372505]: tftpd: trying to get file: /tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/01-d8-9e-f3-13-22-18 Apr 2 19:57:08 helium tftpd[3372508]: tftpd: trying to get file: /tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/01-d8-9e-f3-13-22-18 ..... Apr 2 19:58:54 helium tftpd[3372617]: tftpd: trying to get file: /tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/01-d8-9e-f3-13-22-18 Apr 2 19:59:08 helium tftpd[3372623]: tftpd: trying to get f...

...ey Info: Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption Public-Key: (2048 bit) Modulus: 00:9c:d3:0c:f0:5a:e5:2e:47:b7:72:5d:37:83:b3: 68:63:30:ea:d7:35:26:19:25:e1:bd:be:35:f1:70: 92:2f:b7:b8:4b:41:05:ab:a9:9e:35:08:58:ec:b1: 2a:c4:68:87:0b:a3:e3:75:e4:e6:f3:a7:62:71:ba: 79:81:60:1f:d7:91:9a:9f:f3:d0:78:67:71:c8:69: 0e:95:91:cf:fe:e6:99:e9:60:3c:48:cc:7e:ca:4d: 77:12:24:9d:47:1b:5a:eb:b9:ec:1e:37:00:1c:9c:...

...This is due to mem populated to non-mem region and ignored. Pfn range is also wrongly aligned when mem boundary isn't page aligned. Also need consider the rare case when xen_do_chunk fail(populate). For a dom0 booted with dom_mem=3368952K(0xcd9ff000-4k) dmesg diff is: [ 0.000000] Freeing 9e-100 pfn range: 98 pages freed [ 0.000000] 1-1 mapping on 9e->100 [ 0.000000] 1-1 mapping on cd9ff->100000 [ 0.000000] Released 98 pages of unused memory [ 0.000000] Set 206435 page(s) to 1-1 mapping -[ 0.000000] Populating cd9fe-cda00 pfn range: 1 pages added +[ 0.000000...

...This is due to mem populated to non-mem region and ignored. Pfn range is also wrongly aligned when mem boundary isn't page aligned. Also need consider the rare case when xen_do_chunk fail(populate). For a dom0 booted with dom_mem=3368952K(0xcd9ff000-4k) dmesg diff is: [ 0.000000] Freeing 9e-100 pfn range: 98 pages freed [ 0.000000] 1-1 mapping on 9e->100 [ 0.000000] 1-1 mapping on cd9ff->100000 [ 0.000000] Released 98 pages of unused memory [ 0.000000] Set 206435 page(s) to 1-1 mapping -[ 0.000000] Populating cd9fe-cda00 pfn range: 1 pages added +[ 0.000000...