Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9ddc319".
Did you mean:
9ddc3198
2019 Sep 10
0
[PATCH nbdkit] server: Add nbdkit_export_name() to allow export name to be read.
....h
+++ b/server/internal.h
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ struct connection {
struct b_conn_handle *handles;
size_t nr_handles;
+ char *exportname;
uint32_t cflags;
uint16_t eflags;
bool using_tls;
diff --git a/server/protocol-handshake-newstyle.c b/server/protocol-handshake-newstyle.c
index 9ddc319..e1301a0 100644
--- a/server/protocol-handshake-newstyle.c
+++ b/server/protocol-handshake-newstyle.c
@@ -274,11 +274,17 @@ negotiate_handshake_newstyle_options (struct connection *conn)
if (conn_recv_full (conn, data, optlen,
"read: %s: %m", name_of_nbd_...
2019 Sep 10
2
[PATCH nbdkit] server: Add nbdkit_export_name() to allow export name to be read.
This is the sort of thing I had in mind for option (1) here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-September/msg00047.html
It does reveal that the way we currently list exports is naive to say
the least ...
Rich.