Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9d6d66cc".
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...ally try actually removing it!
>
FWIW, I'm also under the impression that Apple's internal release process
depends on configure+make as well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120620/9d6d66cc/attachment.html>
2012 Jun 21
27
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?
Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay
around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent
enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features
from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement?
If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it!
Nick
-------------- next part