Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9cebf26f".
2010 Aug 28
4
[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?
...lgebraic type systems might suffer a loss of performance due to the need to store union types in memory.
>
> -Chris
>
> --
> -- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100827/9cebf26f/attachment.html>
2010 Jul 20
0
[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>
> >> used to make the code manipulating the union type "well typed". This
> >> approach seems work very well, is there really a need to keep union type
> in
> >> LLVM?
> > I think in its current
2010 Jul 20
4
[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?
On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>> used to make the code manipulating the union type "well typed". This
>> approach seems work very well, is there really a need to keep union type in
>> LLVM?
> I think in its current state the unions should be removed from LLVM IR
> in next release. It's pretty much unfinished and noone is willing to