Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9cc44c30".
2015 Mar 28
0
On ups.status CHRG/DISCHRG Vs battery.charger.status
On Mar 25, 2015, at 4:11 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) Keep the legacy CHRG / DISCHRG status bits for ups.status, along with the complementary ones for battery.charger.status. And advocate (document) for the use of / switch to the latter, that is more suitable for publishing such information. All that with an impact on all the NUT driver, and a transition
2015 Mar 30
1
On ups.status CHRG/DISCHRG Vs battery.charger.status
...ls) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20150330/9cc44c30/attachment.html>
2015 Mar 25
2
On ups.status CHRG/DISCHRG Vs battery.charger.status
Hi NUT developers,
part of the 2.7.3 release, we are about to merge the below branch / PR for
the bcmxcp drivers family:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/158
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/tree/pull_158_bcmxcp_rebased
It has introduced the battery.charger.status variable, which is something I
wanted to implement since around 2007.
However, while considering a similar