Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9cb55746".
2010 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite
On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote:
> 2) The following test is commented out on purpose:
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit
>
> Should this test still be commented out? It’s actually has the most
> lines of code of all your tests and seems quite useful. In addition,
> it seems to work for us. Is there something wrong with this test
> (e.g. buggy
2010 Jan 22
1
[LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite
...ind, wild load or
store somewhere, use-after-free, something like that. It was not I who
disabled it but my data led me to agree with that decision.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100122/9cb55746/attachment.html>
2010 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite
Hi,
I'm using the release version of llvm 2.6. In the
llvm/projects/test-suite directory, there are several tests that are
commented out from running, or not running via a define statement. In
particular, I am inquiring about the status of the EH tests since some
tests seem to be enabled to run by default, but some aren't. From
looking at your tests, I've noticed the following: