search for: 9c3be19a

Yes please. On the practical side, our internal CI does cmake/autoconf x debug/release x gcc/clang (on linux). Cutting out autoconf reduces the number of combinations per build from 8 to 4. This probably doesn't matter to most people but it would be great for us. paul On 2013-05-22 7:14 PM, "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: >Hi All, > >I fear

...___ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130522/9c3be19a/attachment.html>

Hi All, I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one more than we (or I) want to support. I don't know of any support in autoconf past the --host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cmake. I'll send out an assertion here that this support isn't necessary and any system