Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9bcdc80c".
2013 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] Should remove calling NULL pointer or not
On 11/6/13 6:36 PM, Yin Ma wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For a small case, that calls NULL pointer function. LLVM explicitly
> converts
>
> It to a store because it thinks it is not reachable like calling
> undefvalue.
>
> In InstCombineCalls.cpp:930
>
> I think it is not a right approach because calling null pointer function
>
> Will segfault the program.
2013 Nov 07
2
[LLVMdev] Should remove calling NULL pointer or not
..._______________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131107/9bcdc80c/attachment.html>
2013 Nov 07
4
[LLVMdev] Should remove calling NULL pointer or not
Hi,
For a small case, that calls NULL pointer function. LLVM explicitly converts
It to a store because it thinks it is not reachable like calling undefvalue.
In InstCombineCalls.cpp:930
I think it is not a right approach because calling null pointer function
Will segfault the program. Converting to a store will make program pass
Silently. This changes the behavior of a program.