Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9b63de".
Did you mean:
9b63
2020 Mar 24
0
[PATCH] efi/main.c: include <efisetjmp.h>
...uilding on top of gnu-efi 3.0.10 should be
considered irrelevant. A more-relevant test would be to build on top of
the current gnu-efi master head:
https://sf.net/p/gnu-efi/code/ci/HEAD/
https://sf.net/p/gnu-efi/code/ci/master/
ATM (2020.03.24), this is:
https://sf.net/p/gnu-efi/code/ci/9b63de
committed on 2020.01.16.
In addition (JIC), please be aware of the potential building problems
when building with gcc 10.
In the meantime, the Syslinux package from Debian Sid still works
better than upstream (but it still comes with the same bugs /
regressions that Syslinux's upstream b...
2020 Mar 24
2
[PATCH] efi/main.c: include <efisetjmp.h>
Building syslinux against gnu-efi 3.0.10 currently fails with:
syslinux/efi/main.c:33:8: error: unknown type name ?jmp_buf?
33 | static jmp_buf load_error_buf;
| ^~~~~~~
syslinux/efi/main.c: In function ?local_boot?:
syslinux/efi/main.c:189:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ?longjmp? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
189 | longjmp(&load_error_buf, 1);
|
2020 Mar 24
1
[PATCH] efi/main.c: include <efisetjmp.h>
Hello,
Thanks for your feedback.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:17:09 +0200
Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at syslinux.org> wrote:
> > Building syslinux against gnu-efi 3.0.10 currently fails with:
>
> FWIW, gnu-efi version 3.0.11 was released just 20 days after the
> release of version 3.0.10. Building on top of gnu-efi 3.0.10 should be
> considered irrelevant. A more-relevant