Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "9a00e128".
2011 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Bottom-Up Scheduling?
...ft the reservation table backward in time. The latest pipeline stage is dropped.
It's easier to think about hazards in a top-down scheduler.
-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111129/9a00e128/attachment.html>
2011 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Bottom-Up Scheduling?
On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> Andy,
>
> I should have been more clear, the ARM implementation has:
> void ARMHazardRecognizer::RecedeCycle() {
> llvm_unreachable("reverse ARM hazard checking unsupported");
> }
>
> How does that work?
>
> Thanks again,
> Hal
Hal,
My first answer was off the top of my head, so missed the subtle