Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "99xxxxxxxxxx".
Did you mean:
_9xxxxxxxxxx
2004 May 07
5
SIP: Trouble with "Moved temporarily" (302)
...sterisk replaces the @63.214.186.6 by
@context which obviously leads to a failure. Any comments, do I have a
configuration issue on my side that I missed?
Cheers, Philipp
-- Executing Dial("SIP/philipp-bd5f", "SIP/992365264680@nikotel-
out|90") in new stack
-- Called 99xxxxxxxxxx@nikotel-out
-- Got SIP response 302 "Moved Temporarily "new
sip:joesmith@63.214.186.6"" back from 63.214.186.6
-- Now forwarding SIP/philipp-bd5f to 'joesmith@from-sip' (thanks to
SIP/nikotel-out-c286)
May 7 14:20:54 NOTICE[18450]: chan_local.c:362 local_alloc...
2005 Sep 26
0
ZapHFC Channel unavailable
...nference: 0
DSP: no
Relax DTMF: yes
Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0
Default law: alaw
Fax Handled: no
Pulse phone: no
Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF
PRI Flags:
PRI Logical Span: Implicit
Actual Hookstate: Onhook
------
------
*CLI> bri debug span 1
Enabled debugging on span 1
*CLI> dial 99xxxxxxxxxx
*CLI> -- Executing Dial("OSS/dsp", "Zap/g1/xxxxxxxxxx|120") in new stack
Unable to create channel of type 'Zap'
== Everyone is busy/congested at this time
Exiting with DIALSTATUS=CHANUNAVAIL.
------
------ zapata.conf:
[channels]
switchtype = euroisdn
signall...