Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "99a69e23".
2012 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On modern Linux installs, glibc has a very annoying practice: it adds an
> empty exception specifier to lots of libc functions as an optimization. It
> only does this if the compiler is modern and GCC-like, and we are compiling
> in C++ mode.
>
> This, however, causes GCC
2012 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux
...> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120625/99a69e23/attachment.html>
2012 Jun 25
5
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux
Hello,
On modern Linux installs, glibc has a very annoying practice: it adds an
empty exception specifier to lots of libc functions as an optimization. It
only does this if the compiler is modern and GCC-like, and we are compiling
in C++ mode.
This, however, causes GCC to complain about signature mismatches between
the glibc functions declared in malloc.h and those defined as an alias in
the