Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "99883e10".
Did you mean:
998310
2015 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Bitcode abbreviations for something that's not a record
Ok, I'll submit a patch to turn that into a report_fatal_error saying you
can't start an abbrev with an array or blob.
Thanks,
Filipe
F
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> The restriction looks reasonable: A record starts with a code. The code
> can be encoded as a literal or be part of the abbreviation.
>
>