search for: 9982bd7

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "9982bd7".

Did you mean: 992bk7
2011 May 18
1
[PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix patch: virtio_net: limit xmit polling
...x that survived stress test on my box. Pushed on my branch, I'll send a rebased series with Rusty's comments addressed ASAP. drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 9982bd7..c8cd22d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -514,12 +514,14 @@ static bool free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi, int capacity) struct sk_buff *skb; unsigned int len; bool c; + int n; + /* We try to free up at least 2 skbs per one sent, so that we...
2011 May 18
1
[PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix patch: virtio_net: limit xmit polling
...x that survived stress test on my box. Pushed on my branch, I'll send a rebased series with Rusty's comments addressed ASAP. drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 9982bd7..c8cd22d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -514,12 +514,14 @@ static bool free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi, int capacity) struct sk_buff *skb; unsigned int len; bool c; + int n; + /* We try to free up at least 2 skbs per one sent, so that we...
2011 May 04
27
[PATCH 00/18] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here's a large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I sent earlier. It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches I sent out earlier. I know it's a lot to ask but please test, and please consider for 2.6.40 :) I see nice performance improvements: one run showed going from 12 to 18 Gbit/s host to guest with netperf, but I did not spend a lot of time testing performance,
2011 May 04
27
[PATCH 00/18] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here's a large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I sent earlier. It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches I sent out earlier. I know it's a lot to ask but please test, and please consider for 2.6.40 :) I see nice performance improvements: one run showed going from 12 to 18 Gbit/s host to guest with netperf, but I did not spend a lot of time testing performance,