Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "9982bd7".
Did you mean:
992bk7
2011 May 18
1
[PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix patch: virtio_net: limit xmit polling
...x that survived stress test on my box.
Pushed on my branch, I'll send a rebased series
with Rusty's comments addressed ASAP.
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 9982bd7..c8cd22d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -514,12 +514,14 @@ static bool free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi, int capacity)
struct sk_buff *skb;
unsigned int len;
bool c;
+ int n;
+
/* We try to free up at least 2 skbs per one sent, so that we...
2011 May 18
1
[PATCH RFC] virtio_net: fix patch: virtio_net: limit xmit polling
...x that survived stress test on my box.
Pushed on my branch, I'll send a rebased series
with Rusty's comments addressed ASAP.
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 9982bd7..c8cd22d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -514,12 +514,14 @@ static bool free_old_xmit_skbs(struct virtnet_info *vi, int capacity)
struct sk_buff *skb;
unsigned int len;
bool c;
+ int n;
+
/* We try to free up at least 2 skbs per one sent, so that we...
2011 May 04
27
[PATCH 00/18] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here's a large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I
sent earlier. It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches
I sent out earlier.
I know it's a lot to ask but please test, and please consider for 2.6.40 :)
I see nice performance improvements: one run showed going from 12
to 18 Gbit/s host to guest with netperf, but I did not spend a lot
of time testing performance,
2011 May 04
27
[PATCH 00/18] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here's a large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I
sent earlier. It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches
I sent out earlier.
I know it's a lot to ask but please test, and please consider for 2.6.40 :)
I see nice performance improvements: one run showed going from 12
to 18 Gbit/s host to guest with netperf, but I did not spend a lot
of time testing performance,