Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "98dd385".
Did you mean:
981385
2015 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-gpu: fix compilation warnings
...printf(m, "fence %ld %lld\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "fence %lld %lld\n",
atomic64_read(&vgdev->fence_drv.last_seq),
vgdev->fence_drv.sync_seq);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c
index 1da6326..98dd385 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void virtio_timeline_value_str(struct fence *f, char *str, int size)
{
struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence = to_virtio_fence(f);
- snprintf(str, size, "%lu", atomic64_...
2015 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-gpu: fix compilation warnings
...printf(m, "fence %ld %lld\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "fence %lld %lld\n",
atomic64_read(&vgdev->fence_drv.last_seq),
vgdev->fence_drv.sync_seq);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c
index 1da6326..98dd385 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_fence.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void virtio_timeline_value_str(struct fence *f, char *str, int size)
{
struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence = to_virtio_fence(f);
- snprintf(str, size, "%lu", atomic64_...