Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "9899532".
2017 Apr 10
2
IMAP hibernate and scalability in general
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Christian Balzer <chibi at gol.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:13:07 +0300 Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > On 6 Apr 2017, at 21.14, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> imap-hibernate processes are similar to imap-login processes in that
> they
> >
2017 Apr 10
0
IMAP hibernate and scalability in general
...was almost nothing. So I'd expect it to scale well past 10k connections. I think it's mainly limited by Linux, and a quick google shows 500k, but I guess that's per server and not per process. Still, that's likely not all that many CPUs/processes. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9899532/maximum-socket-connection-with-epoll <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9899532/maximum-socket-connection-with-epoll>
> Maybe a better question is, is there anywhere in the login process that is
> possible to block?
Shouldn't be. Well, logging, but all the login processes are shar...
2017 Apr 12
1
IMAP hibernate and scalability in general
...was almost nothing. So I'd expect it to scale well past 10k connections. I think it's mainly limited by Linux, and a quick google shows 500k, but I guess that's per server and not per process. Still, that's likely not all that many CPUs/processes. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9899532/maximum-socket-connection-with-epoll <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9899532/maximum-socket-connection-with-epoll>
As I wrote and from my substantial experience, 8k connections per process
are no issue at all, I'd expect it to go easily up to 50k.
But w/o any pressing reason I'd...