search for: 9896dd99

...atibility goals? > Linker scripts are worse than everything - except for the alternatives that we know about. Any particular suggestions here? -eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150504/9896dd99/attachment.html>

On May 4, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: > It has been said in this thread before, but I fail to see how the atom > model is an actual improvement over the fine grained section model. It > seems to be artifically restricted for no good reasons. Sections come with a huge amount of bloat and overhead that atoms do not. >> Lets stop

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:52:55PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > I think the problem here is that these lead to natural and inescapable > tensions, and Alex summarized how Camp B has been steering LLD away > from what Camp A people want. This isn’t bad in and of itself, because > what Camp B wants is clearly and unarguably good for LLVM. However, > it is also not sufficient, and