Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "989616".
Did you mean:
989116
2003 Dec 19
2
[LLVMdev] Union Type
As a side effect of bug 178 (Stacker not handling 64-bit pointers on
Solaris), I got thinking about a union type for LLVM. Is there any
good reason that LLVM shouldn't support unions? This is essentially a
structure that has its members all at the same address rather than at
sequential addresses. I know there are various issues with unions
(alignment, etc.) but wouldn't it make sense to